1939 · CLOSE READING
Eight Lectures on Yoga
Eight Lectures on Yoga (1939), PDF p. 36
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
are doing nothing of the sort. But at least we are deluding ourselves into
thinking that we are doing it, and the point is that, according to tradition,
if you can hold the mind still for as much as twelve seconds you will get
one of the highest results of Yoga. It is certainly a fact that when you are
doing a cycle of 20 seconds out, 10 in, and 30 holding, there is quite a
long period during the holding period when the mind does tend to stop its
malignant operations. By the time this cycle has become customary, you
are able to recognise instinctively the arrival of the moment when you can
throw yourself suddenly into the mental act of concentration. In other
words, by Asana and Pranayama you have worked yourself into a position
where you are free, if only for a few seconds, to attempt actual Yoga
processes, which you have previously been prevented from attempting by
the distracting activities of the respiratory and muscular systems.
24. And so? Yes. Pranayama may be described as nice clean fun.
Before you have been doing it very long, things are pretty certain to begin
to happen, though this, I regret to remark, is fun to you, but death to
Yoga.
The classical physical results of Pranayama are usually divided into
four stages:
1. Perspiration. This is not the ordinary perspiration which comes from
violent exercise; it has peculiar properties, and I am not going to tell you
what these are, because it is much better for you to perform the
practices, obtain the experience, and come to me yourself with the
information. In this way you will know that you have got the right thing,
whereas if I were to tell you now, you would very likely imagine it.
2. Automatic rigidity: the body becomes still, as the result of a spasm.
This is perfectly normal and predictable. It is customary to do it with a
dog. You stick him in a bell-jar, pump in oxygen or carbonic acid or
something, and the dog goes stiff. You can take him out and wave him
around by a leg as if he were frozen. This is not quite the same thing, but
near it.
25. Men of science are terribly handicapped in every investigation by
having been trained to ignore the immeasurable. All phenomena have
subtle qualities which are at present insusceptible to any properly
scientific methods of investigation. We can imitate the processes of nature
in the laboratory, but the imitation is not always exactly identical with the
original. For instance, Professor J. B. S. Haldane attempted some of the
experiments suggested in 'The Equinox' in this matter of Pranayama, and
very nearly killed himself in the process. He did not see the difference
between the experiment with the dog and the phenomena which
supervene as the climax of a course of gentle operation. It is the
difference between the exhilaration produced by sipping Clos Vougeot '26
and the madness of swilling corn whiskey. It is the same foolishness as to
think that sniffing cocaine is a more wholesome process than chewing
coca leaves. Why, they exclaim, cocaine is chemically pure! Cocaine is the
active principle! We certainly do not want these nasty leaves, where our
sacred drug is mixed up with a lot of vegetable stuff which rather defies
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 11ea06f5df920a5b4a5d7e16:p00036
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.