1939 · CLOSE READING
Eight Lectures on Yoga
Eight Lectures on Yoga (1939), PDF p. 54
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
25. I feel almost ashamed of the world that I have to tell you that in
the year 1900, four years before the appearance of Einstein's world-
shaking paper, I described space as 'finite yet boundless,' which is exactly
the description in general terms that he gave in more mathematical
detail.[4] You will see at once that these three words do describe a curved
geometry; a sphere, for instance, is a finite object, yet you can go over
the surface in any direction without ever coming to an end.
I said above that Riemann's Geometry was not quite sufficient to
explain the phenomena of nature. We have to postulate different kinds of
curvature in different parts of the continuum. And even then we are not
happy!
26. Now for a spot of Sullivan! 'The geometry is so general that it
admits of different degrees of curvature in different parts of space-time.
It is to this curvature that gravitational effects are due. The curvature of
space-time is most prominent, therefore, around large masses, for here
the gravitational effects are most marked. If we take matter as
fundamental, we may say that it is the presence of matter that causes the
curvature of space-time. But there is a different school of thought that
regards matter as due to the curvature of space-time. That is, we assume
as fundamental a space-time continuum manifest to our senses as what
we call matter. Both points of view have strong arguments to recommend
them. But, whether or not matter may be derived from the geometrical
peculiarities of the space-time continuum, we may take it as an
established scientific fact that gravitation has been so derived. This is
obviously a very great achievement, but it leaves quite untouched
another great class of phenomena, namely, electro-magnetic phenomena.
In this space-time continuum of Einstein's the electro-magnetic forces
appear as entirely alien. Gravitation has been absorbed, as it were, into
Riemannian geometry, and the notion of force, so far as gravitational
phenomena are concerned, has been abolished. But the electro-magnetic
forces still flourish undisturbed. There is no hint that they are
manifestations of the geometrical peculiarities of the space-time
continuum. And it can be shown to be impossible to relate them to
anything in Riemann's Geometry. Gravitation can be shown to correspond
to certain geometrical peculiarities of a Riemannian space-time. But the
electro-magnetic forces lie completely outside this scheme.'
27. Here is the great quag into which mathematical physics has led its
addicts. Here we have two classes of phenomena, all part of a unity of
physics. Yet the equations which describe and explain the one class are
incompatible with those of the other class! This is not a question of
philosophy at all, but a question of fact. It does not do to consider that
the universe is composed of particles. Such a hypothesis underlies one
class of phenomena, but it is nonsense when applied to the electro-
magnetic equations, which insist upon our abandoning the idea of
particles for that of waves.
Here is another Welsh rabbit for supper!
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 11ea06f5df920a5b4a5d7e16:p00054
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.