1906 · CLOSE READING
Collected Works (Vol. II)
Collected Works (Vol. II) (1906), PDF p. 202
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
196
THE SWORD OF SONG OO
night, often working forty hours at a time,
work which he destined to entrance the world.
All England should ring with his praises; by-
and-by the whole world should know his name.
Of these works none of the longer and more
ambitious remains, How they were lost, and
how those fragments we possess were saved, is
best told vy relating the romantic and almost
incredible story of his life.
The known facts of this life are few, vague,
and unsatisfactory; the more definite state-
ments lack corroboration, and almost the only
source at the disposal of the biographer is the
letters of Mathilde Doriac to Mdme. J. S., who
has kindly placed her portfolio at my service.
A letter dated October 15, 1866, indicates that
our author was born on the 23rd of that month.
The father and mother of George were, at
least on the surface, of an extraordinary re-
ligious turn of mind. Mathilde’s version of
the story, which has its source in our friend
himself, agrees almost word for word with a
letter of the Rev. Edw. Turle to Mrs. Cope,
recommending the child to her care. ‘The
substance of the story is as follows.
The parents of George carried their religious
ideas to the point of never consummating their
marriage!* This arrangement does not seem
to have been greatly appreciated by the wife;
at least one fine morning she was found to be
enceinte. The foolish father never thought of
the hypothesis which commends itself most
readily to a man of the world, not to say a man
of science, and adopted that of a second
Messiah! He took the utmost pains to con-
ceal the birth of the child, treated everybody
who came to the house as an emissary of
Herod, and finally made up his mind to flee
into Egypt! Like most religious maniacs, he
never had an idea of his own, but distorted the
beautiful and edifying events of the Bible into
insane and ridiculous ones, which he proceeded
to plagiarise.
On the voyage out the virgin mother became
enamoured, as was her wont, of the nearest
male, in this case a fellow-traveller. He, being
well able to support her in the luxury which
She desired, easily persuaded her to leave the
boat with him by stealth. A small sailing
vessel conveyed them to Malta, where they
disappeared. The only trace left in the books
of earth records that this fascinating character
was accused, four years later, in Vienna, of
poisoning her paramour, but thanks to the
wealth and influence of her newer lover, she
escaped.
The legal father, left by himself with a squall-
ing child to amuse, to appease in his tantrums,
* Will it be believed that a clergyman (turned
Plymouth Brother and schoolmaster) actually made
an identical confession to a boy of ten years old?
and to bring up in the nurture and admonition
of the Lord, was not a little perplexed by the
sudden disappearance of his wife. At first he
supposed that she had been translated, but,
finding that she had not left the traditional
mantle behind her, he abandoned this suppo-
sition in favour of quite a different, and indeed
a more plausible one. He now believed her to
be the scarlet woman in the Apocalypse, with
variations. On arrival in Egypt he hired an
old native nurse, and sailed for Odessa. Once
in Russia he could find Gog and Magog, and
present to them the child as Antichrist. For
he was now persuaded that he himself was the
First Beast, and would’ ask the sceptic to count
his seven heads and ten horns. The heads,
however, rarely totted up accurately !
At this point the accounts of Mr. Turle and
Mathilde diverge slightly. The cleric affirms
that he was induced by a Tartar lady, of an.
honourable and ancient profession, to accom-
pany her to Tibet ‘‘to be initiated into the
mysteries.’’ He was, of course, robbed and
murdered with due punctuality, in the town of
‘Kiev. Mathilde’s story is that he travelled to
Kiev on the original quest, and died of typhoid
or cholera. In any case, he died at Kiev in
1839. This fixes the date of the child’s birth at
1837. His faithful nurse conveyed him safely
to England, where his relatives provided for
his maintenance and education.
With the close of this romantic chapter in his
early history we lose all reliable traces for some
years. One flash alone illumines the darkness
of his boyhood; in 1853, after being prepared
for confirmation, he cried out in full assembly,
instead of kneeling to receive .the blessing of
the officiating bishop, ‘‘I renounce for ever
this idolatrous church;”’ and was quietly re-
moved.
He told Mathilde Doriac that he had been to
Eton and Cambridge—neither institution, how-
ever, preserves any record of such admission.
The imagination of George, indeed, is tremend-
ously fertile with regard to events in his own
life. His own story is that he entered ‘Trinity
College, Cambridge, in 1856, and was sent
down two years later for an article which he
had contributed to some University or College
Magazine. No confirmation of any sort is to
be found anywhere with regard to these or any
other statements of our author. There is,
however, no doubt that in 1861 he quarrelled
with his family; went over to Paris, where he
settled down, at first, like every tufthead,
somewhere in the Quartier Latin; later, with
Mathilde Doriac, the noble woman who became
his mistress and held to him through all the.
terrible tragedy of his moral, mental, and
physical life, in the Rue du Faubourg-Poisson-
niére. At his house there the frightful scene
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 59a930c2e614ddb0b1a2a000:p00202
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.