1906 · CLOSE READING
Collected Works (Vol. II)
Collected Works (Vol. II) (1906), PDF p. 286
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
28a
TIME
sense of the Bible, thus degrading a sublime
text-book of mystic lore into the merest
nursery, or too often bawdy-house, twaddle
and filth. You wili alter all this, my friends!
Let Science keep the books:
Scepl, For a cross between a plodding ass
and an old stocking, she will do well! And
what dividends do you promise?
AJyst. In the first year. Dhyana; in the
second, Samadhi; and inthe third, Nirvana.
Scept, It is not the first year yet. Is this
coin current?
Afyst. Ah! I remember now your phrase
‘Dhyana a debaucn.’’ You are of course
familiar with the name of Maudsley, perhaps
the greatest living authority on the brain?
Scept, None greater.
Afjst. By rare gocd fortune, at the very
moment when this aspect of the question was
confronting me, and I was (so any one would
have imagined) many thousand miles from
expert opinion, I had the opportunity of
putting the matter before him. Our conversa-
tion was pretty much as foliows: ‘* What is
the cause of the phenomenon I have de-
scribed?” (I had given just such a sketch
as we have drawn above, and added that it
was the most cherished possession of all
Eastern races. The state was familiar to
him.) ‘‘ Excessive activity of one portion of
the brain: relative lethargy of the rest.” ‘“ Of
which portion ?”” “It is unknown.” ‘Is the
phenomenon of pathological significance
?”’
‘‘T cannot say so much: it would be a danger-
ous habit to acquire: but since recovery is
spontaneous, and is apparently complete, it
isto be classed as physiological.’ I obtained
the idea, however, that the danger was very
serious, perhaps more so than the actual
words used would imply. A further inquiry
as to whether he could suggest any medical,
surgical, or other means, by which this state
inight be produced at will, led to no result.
Scept. This is most interesting: for the
very doubts which I did entertain as to the
safety of mental methods directed to attain-
ing this result, are dispelled by what is a
cautious. if not altogether unfavourable, view
from a naturally-inclined-to-be-unfavourable
Western mind. (My mother was of German
extraction.) How so? Because my teacher,
himselfa Western scientific man of no mean
attainments, thought no trouble too great, no
language too violent (though he is ordinarily
a man of unusual mildness and suavity of
manner) to be used, to impress upon me the
extreme danger of too vigorous attempts to
reach the state of concentration. ‘If you
feel the least tired in the course of your
daily practice,” he never wearied of repeat-
ing, ‘you have done too much, and must
absolutely rest for four-and-twenty hours,
However fresh you feel, however keen you
are to pursue the work, rest you must, or
you will but damage the apparatus you are
endeavouring to perfect. Rest for longer if
you like, never for less.” This adjuration
recurs with great force to my mind at the
present moment. Our Western *‘ Adepts ”—
if you were a Western I would ask you to
forgive the word—know, as the great brain
specialist knows, the dangers of the practice ;
the dangers of the training, the dangers of
success.
Adyst. Blavatsky’s mysteriously
- phrased
threats were to this effect. Maybe she knew.
Scept. Maybe she did. Well, what I
wished to point out was that, had you pressed
Dr. Maudsley, he might possibly have ad-
mitted that scientific precaution, under trained
guidance and watching, might diminish the
danger greatly, and permit the student to
follow out this line of research without in-
curring the stigma—if it be a stigma—of
risking his sanity, or at least his general
mental welfare?!
1 Dr. Maudsley, to whom I submitted the
MS. of this portion of the dialogue, was good
enough to say that it represented very much
what he had said, and to add that ‘‘ the
‘ecstasy,’ if attained, signifies such a ‘stand-
ing-out,’ éx-crag.s, quasi-spasmodic, of a
special tract of the brain as, if persisted in,
involves the risk of a permanent loss of power,
almost in the end a paralysis of the other tracts.
—Like other bad habits, it grows by what it
feeds on, and may put the fine and complex
co-ordinated machinery quite out of gear. The
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 59a930c2e614ddb0b1a2a000:p00286
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.