1929 · CLOSE READING
Confessions of Aleister Crowley
Confessions of Aleister Crowley (1929), PDF p. 270
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
270
eighth, and a week later accepted an invitation from the Maharaja of Moharbhanj to shoot big game
in his province.
I was very sad at heart about the death of my friends, but with regard to the mountain I was in
excellent spirits. I had demonstrated beyond doubt the existence of an easy way up. I was sure of
being able to establish a main camp within striking distance of the summit, and I had familiarized
myself with all the vagaries of the weather and the snow. Cut short as the expedition had been, at
its first leap, the actual attainment had not been insignificant. We had reached a height of
approximately twenty-five thousand feet, and found life at that altitude as enjoyable and work as
easy as anywhere else. I had written a detailed proposal to Eckenstein, suggesting that we should
tackle the mountain in 1906 --- but no foreigners!
{444}
53
I had been so concentrated on Kangchenjunga that the other facts of my life had not glittered
perceptibly. They had kept up with me, but I hardly knew it. They were now to shine, the bushel of
Kangchenjunga having been rudely removed.
My instinct against The Book of the Law had apparently had its way. It was as if the events of
eighteen months before had never taken place. I was going on with Magick on the old lines, without
any particular aqmbition, but quietly exercising the powers already obtained. For instance, I had
established regular communications with Soror F. (Soror Fidelis --- Mrs. Elaine Simpson). We had
long interviews, visiting each other alternately. I was a little better than she was, but her body was
quite material enough to impress all the senses.
It occurs to me that I ought to give further details. Our astral bodies, as we had got them, were
replicas of our physical bodies, save that they were slightly larger. Hers, for example, was just over
sic feet high instead of five feet seven inches. The body was self-luminous and partially transparent,
so that I could see the background behind her, much as through a muslin curtain. The substance of
the body appeared homogeneous. It was usually clothed and crowned. The materials were of the
same quality of matter as the body, but could be distinguished from flesh by such optical devices as
colour and reflections. We moved according to the laws of the astral plane; that is, without making
the normal physical actions, though we were able to use our limbs in the ordinary way. We
communicated, sometimes by audible speech, sometimes by direct transmission of thought such as
occurs every day in ordinary life, when one knows what a friend is going to say before he says it.
One very curious phenomenon must be recorded. In the early days we had arranged special hours
for our interviews by calculating the difference of time due to longitude. We now summoned each
other by means of the astral bell. But on comparison of our records we discovered an astounding
fact. Although we agreed about the character of the interview, the subject of conversation etc., we
found that the time did not necessarily correspond. That is: suppose I went to see her at midnight
on Friday (India), she did not see me at four a.m. on Saturday (England) but at some other time
which might be later or earlier. I could easily imagine a delay in my appearance, but it seemed to
me nonsense that I should have arrived before I started! At that time I understood little of the
nature of time.
{445}
My lyric gift had begun to sit up and take notice a little after the shock of the realization of all its
aspirations. I had begun to write again. Some of my poems at this period were definitely
rationalistic. I was already aware that the rationalist position was wooden and shallow. The
members of the Rationalist Press Association were no less narrow-minded sectarians than the
Evangelicals. They had the same suburban point of view, the same prudish exclusiveness; they were
shocked by any fact which did not immediately fit into their framework, and angrily denied its
existence.
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 5ef44b98d8f9c4af5f6f86e1:p00270
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.