1929 · CLOSE READING
Confessions of Aleister Crowley
Confessions of Aleister Crowley (1929), PDF p. 367
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
367
{590}
they happen to be our personal property. The intuitions of the Neschamah are guaranteed by
interior certainty, and then cannot be criticized for the simple reason that they have themselves
completed the work of criticism of the most destructive kind before presenting themselves at all.
Buddhist psychology has analysed many of these characteristics of super-consciousness and even
arranged them in an order corresponding with spiritual development.
I may say that I have toiled for many years to express ideas of this order in terms intelligible to the
normal consciousness and susceptible of apprehension by the normal intellect. Success has scarcely
been complete; only on rare occasions has the flash fixed itself on the film when the lens was in
focus and the exposure correct. I am acutely aware that many of my most arduous and ardent
attempts to interpret mystical experience have resulted in blurred images, sometimes perhaps
grandiose and suggestive --- but that is no compensation for obscurity and vagueness. May I present
one effort which I myself am able to hold more or less clearly in my ordinary consciousness?
The Buddhists describe the closest approximation to true observation of anything by saying that it is
seen in the four-fold formless state, which they define in the following terms: Any proposition about
an object is simultaneously perceived as being both true and false, but also neither true nor false.
To perceive an object in this manner implies that the observer has attained the last possible degree
of spiritual development which permits any positive point of view soever. Such a man is but one
step from the threshold of Arahatship. He has only to destroy this conception of things, as is done in
this four-fold formless state, to attain the trance Nerodha-Sammapatti, in which all being and form
is absolutely annihilated, so much so that the trance is only distinguishable from Nibbana by the
fact that one comes out of it.
It was on October 2nd, 1919 that I first attained to this Pisgah-sight of the promised land, Pari-
Nibbana. I was spending the night in Fleischmann's Turkish Baths in New York. It was my custom in
all such places to practise the tenth clause of my vow as a Master of the Temple, "To interpret
every phenomenon as a particular dealing of God with my soul", by forcing advertisements and other
public announcements to yield some spiritual significance. I would either apply the Cabbala to the
words and manipulate the numbers so as to reach a state of mind in which some truth might
suddenly spring in the silence, or I would play upon the words as if they were oracles, or else force
the filthy falsehoods of fraudulent dollar-dervishes to transfigure themselves at the touch of my
talisman into mysterious messages from the Masters.
I had awakened at dawn and meditated a while upon this four-fold formless state. I was merely
trying to make out what could possibly be meant by
{591}
piling contradiction on contradiction as the definition did. I did not understand it in the least, and I
had not the slightest intention of trying to reach realization of it. At that time all such meditation
was entirely out of my line, but accidents will happen even in the best regulated magical circles and
the following extraordinary experience knocked me sideways.
I quote verbatim my Magical Record:
I was putting on my bath-robe after weighing, and turning a sleeve inside out, when my masseur, an
holy man positively trembling on the brink of Arahatship, cried to me that both sides of it were
inside, and both outside. I replied humbly that I was seeking for a side that neither inside nor
outside --- and then like a flash I saw that I had it! Oh Glory Ineffable of Realization! (Oh Right
Thinking!) For either side is both inside and outside because I can use it as such, and it is neither
inside nor outside with regard to the discrimination which might be made by an uninitiate between
any one thing an any other thing.
Now this quality is not in the robe, which has two sides easily distinguishable by hemmings,
machining, etc., to say nothing of orientation in space, but in me, and arises from my positive
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 5ef44b98d8f9c4af5f6f86e1:p00367
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.