1929 · CLOSE READING
Confessions of Aleister Crowley
Confessions of Aleister Crowley (1929), PDF p. 548
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
548
did not even take the trouble to invent plausible accounts of themselves; e.g., there would be a
Persian guide named Schmidt and her Chinese master who issued instructions which were on the
level of, and quite indistinguishable from, Sunday School exaltation. Her pet persuasion was that
she was to travel eastward for three years and after some adventure with a "M. Joperal", an
Englishman (the well-known Shropshire or the Essex branch of that typically English tribe), she
would proceed to Japan where her destined soul-mate was waiting to marry her, the climax being
the birth of a Messiah.
Amid this steaming midden of putrefying manure, I detected rare posies. She had got two or three
symbols both intelligible and indicative of initiation.
During her first few weeks at the abbey, every day was one long battle. I hacked through her barbed
wire of aggressive axioms. I forced her to confess the incongruity of her assertions. I drilled holes in
her vanity and self-satisfaction. I dug her critical spirit out of its corner, and made her clean off
{864}
the rust, sharpen the edge and the point, and polish the steel till it shone. When she saw it, she
feared it all the more; but I forced her to grasp it and use it. At every stroke she split the skull of
one of her dearest delusions and shrieked as if its destruction were her own. She dropped the sword
every time my eye was off her, but I always made her pick it up and do some more damage, till at
last she found out that killing falsehoods, never so smiling and so like her idea of herself, did not
hurt her, but on the contrary freed her, and she also found that the harder she struck at truth the
stronger it stood. So in the end, she learnt the value of the critical spirit and made it one of her
regular weapons.
Besides this intellectual trouble she suffered from moral maladies of a similar sort. She had always
taken for truth any assertion that sounded impressive and seemed to suit her ideas of right and
wrong. She was shocked to the limit by our principles and conduct. She gazed with a dropped jaw
and glassy eyes, wondering how it was that the frightful catastrophes which were bound to result
did not happen. It was a little like those crofters at foyers waiting to see the wrath of God consume
the aluminum works that scorned the sabbath. Was she dreaming? Were we really living, loving and
laughing, healthy and happy, when, by all rules, we ought to be shrieking with agony in the
madhouse, the gaol or the lock hospital! Worse still, she missed all those familiar features to be
observed in even the best of families, petty jealousies, scolding, quarrelling, bickering, tyranny and
the rest. Can you beat it? Being a woman of sense, it soon struck her that there must be some
reason for these strange phenomena, and we took every chance to point out how in any particular
case, whose circumstances would have created trouble in other communities, the strict application
of the Law of Thelema provided a solution which satisfied all parties. She observed also in her own
case that for the first time in her life she was really free to do what she willed. Her only trouble
came from her own attempts to interfere with us in the interests of some cold-storage convention,
whenever she tried to put forward some opinion or popular principle originally invented to suit
medieval conditions, and so cherished through centuries as a fetish, despite its irrelevance to
reality.
Let me illustrate this by one case. In her room was a sketch of a famous group in the museum of
Naples. It shocked her; blinded her eyes. She could not see what it was, that is, a symphony of
exquisitely harmonized lines. The subject obsessed her; whereas we, being trained to seek truth
and beauty in each and every impression, saw the implication of the sketch as a secondary and
quite unimportant quality. More, granting the subject to suggest the expression of a passion which
might or might not be sympathetic, we could at least temper our approval or aversion by reflecting
that whatever we personally might feel about it, its right to existence was absolute, exactly as
{865}
we acquiesce in the horse, the tiger, the eagle and the snake as equally essential to the perfection
of the universe. But to her, perception was paralysed by emotion, and emotion was at the mercy of
the idea which assailed it. She was incapable of reasoning about the sketch or even of resisting its
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 5ef44b98d8f9c4af5f6f86e1:p00548
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.