1929 · CLOSE READING
Confessions of Aleister Crowley
Confessions of Aleister Crowley (1929), PDF p. 564
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
564
On my arrival in London the position was that after paying warehouse charges to date, they owed
me a little over ten pounds. They had written several times to urge me to remove the stock,
alleging lack of space in their warehouse. I called and renewed my friendly acquaintance with
Jacobi who agreed to hold the books till the end of May, to give me time to arrange for their
removal. He furnished me with a complete set of the books as samples.
{890}
I had approached Heinemann's with a scheme to dispose of the stock. They were to publish every
month for a year a small volume of selections, lyrics, religious verses, essays, stories, plays, etc.,
with the idea that the readers would acquire the taste and buy the original editions. Heinemann's
ultimately rejected this proposal --- very reluctantly, and I believe on account of the violent
personal opposition of one of their staff, a man whom I had never met. I found a new warehouse in
due course and called to arrange a convenient day to remove the books.
To my surprise a perfect stranger came into the outer office, a weird creature of nightmare, long,
loose-jointed, shaking and tottering with palsy, with a head grotesque and ghastly, rocking upon
narrow sloping shoulders that seemed to shrink from its weight. This fantastic horror announced
itself as the managing director of the new company. I stated my business. To my amazement, he
broke out into a spate of unmeaning insults. He refused point-blank to deliver the books on the
ground that Scotland Yard would be down on him if he did. I said, "But this is ridiculous. What has
Scotland Yard to do with the matter? If you really think they are concerned, ring them up at once.
Ask them!" He went off saying he would telephone, and returned in a few minutes saying that they
would make inquiries and let him know in a few days.
Of course the police had no interest in the matter at all. But this goblin still refused delivery. I
could only suppose him a lunatic. He did not merely insult me but Mr Jacobi, the best of printers, by
far the most eminent in England, a man who had spent his life in the service of the art and who had
done more for it than any single man since Caxton.
Warner, for so my lunatic called himself, spoke of Jacobi in terms that would have been harsh
applied to a dishonest office boy. I wrote to Jacobi personally. He replied as I anticipated, but
admitted that the control had passed from his hands. Warner flew in even a more furious rage than
ever at my having written, and his having replied. I had known Jacobi since '98, and our business
relationship during the twenty-five years had been unbroken and uniformly pleasant. I found my
friends scarcely able to believe the story. Such conduct as Warner's was incredible. It was obvious,
however, even to him that some settlement was necessary. We had a final interview. He resorted to
all kinds of absurd arguments quite impertinent to the business on hand and took an attitude in flat
contradiction to that adopted by the firm. At the last moment, he suddenly shifted his ground. A
furtive gleam of cunning came into his eyes and he suggested that it would be all right if I took the
books away without his official knowledge. It was the first sensible thing he had said. It was
arranged that he should consult the directors as a matter of form, and then arrange an hour for the
removal over the telephone as it might be convenient for him to be out of the way at the time. We
parted on this
{891}
understanding. But the next morning I got a letter that everything was off.
I reflected on the Yi's research: "It will be advantageous to use legal constraints" and went round to
my lawyer. He advised me that they had no case. The one technical difficulty which related to some
few volumes could be obviated easily enough. Correspondence ensued, and finally he interviewed
the solicitors of the firm and came to a satisfactory arrangement. Warner was away on his holiday,
but the business would go through directly he returned. Not at all! He went back on everything and
defied me to obtain possession. And there the matter stands, as far as I know. I have never been
able to collect sufficient funds to recover my property which constitutes my principal asset. If
Warner is even partially sane the motive is beyond my wit to imagine. Can he possibly hope that I
shall drop the matter, and let him get away with twenty thousand pounds of stolen property?
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 5ef44b98d8f9c4af5f6f86e1:p00564
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.