1929 · CLOSE READING
Confessions of Aleister Crowley
Confessions of Aleister Crowley (1929), PDF p. 90
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
90
The morrow dawned. At breakfast I inquired for Baker. He had left the hotel; no one knew where
he had gone. I telegraphed all over the valley. He was located at the Gorner Grat. I sped up the
mountain to find him. Again he had gone. I rushed back. In vain I hunted him through the hotels
and at the railway station. At last I got a report than an Englishmen corresponding to
{164}
his description had started to walk down the valley to Brigue. I hurled myself headlong in pursuit.
This time I was rewarded. I caught up with him some ten miles below Zermatt. I told him of my
search for the Secret Sanctuary of the Saints and convinced him of my desperate earnestness. He
hinted that he knew of an Assembly which might be that for which I was looking. He spoke of a
Sacrament where the elements were four instead of two. This meant nothing to me; but I felt that I
was on the right track. I got him to promise to meet me in London. He added, "I will introduce you
to a man who is much more of a Magician than I am."
To sum the matter in brief, he kept his word. The Secret Assembly materialized as the "Hermetic
Order of the G.·. D.·.," and the Magician as one George Cecil Jones.
During the whole summer, the weather got steadily worse and my health took the same course. I
found myself obliged to leave the camp and go to London to see doctors. I took rooms in an hotel
in London, attended to the necessary medical treatment and spent my time writing poetry. The
play Jephthah was my principal work at this period. It shows a certain advance in bigness of
conception; and has this notable merit, that I began to realize the possibility of objective treatment
of a theme. Previous to this, my lyrics had been more or less successful expressions of the ego;
and I had made few attempts to draw characters who were not more than Freudian wish phantasms
--- I mean by this that they were either projections of myself as I fancied myself or aspired to be;
otherwise, images of women that I desired to love. When I say "to Love", I doubt whether the verb
meant anything more than "to find myself through". But in Jephthah, weak as the play is, I was
really taking an interest in other people. The characters are not wholly corrupted by self-
portraiture, I suck to the Hebrew legend accurately enough, merely introducing a certain amount of
Cabbalistic knowledge.
The passionate dedication to Swinburne is significant of my literary hero-worship. With this play
were published (in 1899) a number of lyrics entitled "Mysteries, Lyrical and Dramatic". The shallow
critic hastily assumed that the influence of Swinburne was paramount in my style, but on rereading
the volume I do not think that the accusation is particularly justifiable. There are plenty of other
authors who might more reasonably be served with an affiliation summons. Indeed, criticism in
England amounts to this: that if a new writer manifests any sense of rhythm, he is classed as an
imitator of Swinburne; if any capacity for thought, of Browning.
I remember one curious incident in connection with this volume. I had a set of paged proofs in my
pocket one evening, when I went to call on W. B. Yeats. I had never though much of his work; it
seemed to me to lack virility. I have given an extended criticism of it in The Equinox (vol. I No. II,
page 307). However, at that time I should have been glad to have a
{165}
kindly word from an elder man. I showed him the proofs accordingly and he glanced through them.
He forced himself to utter a few polite conventionalities, but I could see what the truth of the
matter was.
I had by this time become fairly expert in clairvoyance, clairaudience and clairsentience. But it
would have been a very dill person indeed who failed to recognize the black, billious rage that
shook him to the soul. I instance this as a proof that Yeats was a genuine poet at heart, for a mere
charlatan would have known that he had no cause to fear an authentic poet. What hurt him was
the knowledge of his own incomparable inferiority.
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 5ef44b98d8f9c4af5f6f86e1:p00090
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.