1913 · CLOSE READING
The Rosicrucian Scandal
The Rosicrucian Scandal (1913), PDF p. 7
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
Matuers. He had an aversion to all such matters amounting
to horror.
Scorpio, K.C. What was the condition of his health?
MarHers. He was a constant sufferer from spasmodic asthma
in its most aggravated form.
Scorpio, K.C. He took drugs habitually?
Maruers. Yes, by the orders of his doctor.
Scorpio, K.C. Never for pleasure?
MarTuers. Never.
Scorpio, K.C. How can you be sure?
Matuers. When he left England, the change of climate cured
at least temporarily his disease. and he instantly abandoned the
practice.
Scorpio, K.C. He left you on good terms?
MatHeErs. Yes.
Scorpio, K.C. And you have never quarrelled with him since?
Matuers. Never.
Scorpio. K.C. Then why do you detame him now and allow
the vilest crimes to be imputed to him?
Matuers. Anything to damage Crowley!
Scorpio, K.C. Did you quarrel with him ever at the time?
MatHERS. Yes.
Scorpio, K.C. Let me read you the published account of your
quarrel:
seen, induced Mathers to put in force the
Deadly and Hostile Current of Will, but, as in the case of the Jackdaw of
Rheims, nobody seemed a penny the worse. One might have expected that
Mathers having failed, Aleister Crowley would have abandoned him. No, for
it seemed still possible that Mathers, really in touch with the Supreme Chiefs,
had yet finally decided to say with Christ upon the Cross ; “ Father, forgive
them, for they know not what they do,” even though this theory was some-
what rudely shaken by Mathers spending the whole of one Sunday afternoon
in rattling a lot of dried peas in a sieve under the impression that they were
the revolted members : as subsequent events proved, they were only the ideas
in his head. So we find Aleister Crowley still loyal, if a little sceptical, and
searching within himself to discover a touchstone by which he might prove
beyond doubt the authenticity of Mathers’ claim to represent the Masters. Now,
there had been a good deal of talk of an adventure that happened to Mathers
and Allan Bennett, who was guest in his house, in which a revolver figured
prominently; but the story was only vague, and Allan Bennett, who could and
would have told the truth about it, had departed for a distant colony. So on
arriving in F Aleister Crowley lured Mathers into telling the story, which
was as follows: That he and Allan Bennett had disagreed upon an obscure point
in theology, thereby formulating the accursed Dyad, thereby enabling the
Abramelin demons to assume material form : one in his own shape, another in
that of Allan Bennett. Now, the demon that looked like Allan Bennett had a
revolver, and threatened to shoot him (Mathers), while the demon that resem-
hoot Allan Bennett. Fortunately, before
the demons could fire, Mrs. Mathers came into the room, thus formulating the
symbol of the blessed Trinity, of which her great purity of character would
naturally fit her to be a prominent member. Now, the only probability about
He (Crowley) had, as we have
bled himself was equally anxious to
7
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: 619577bba7c1bf3ffdb55390:p00007
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.