1929 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1) (1929), PDF p. 64
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
CBAPTER V
The Formula of I.A.O.
This formula is the principal and most characteristic formula
of Osiris, of the Rédemption of Mankind. I is Isis, Nature,
ruined by A, Apophis the Destroyer, and restored to life by the
Redeemer Osiris.1 The sanie idea is expressed by the Rosicrucian
formula of the Trinity:
Ex Deo nas ci mur.
In Je su morimur.
Per Sfiritum Sanctum reviviscimus.
This is also identical with the Word Lux L.V.X., which is
formed by the arrns of a cross. It is this formula which is implied
in those ancient and modem monuments in which the phallus is
worshipped as the Saviour of the World.
The doctrine of résurrection as vulgarly understood is false and
absurd. It is not even “Scriptural”. St. Paul does not identify
the glorified body which rises with the mortal body which dies.
On the contrary, he repeatedly insists on the distinction.
The same is true of a magical ceremony. The magician who is
destroyed by absorption in the Godhead is really destroyed. The
I. There is a quite different formula in which I is the Father, O the
Mother, A the child — and yet another, in which I. A. O. are ail fathers
of different kir.ds balanced by H. H. H., 3 Mothers, to complété the
Universe. In a third, the true formula of the Beast 666, I and O are
îhe opposites which form the field for the operation of A. But this is a
higher matter unsuited for this eîementary handbook. See, however,
Liber Samekh, Point II, Section J.
28
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ada196c290adc6561dda8e9d:p00064
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.