1929 · CLOSE READING
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1)
Magick in Theory and Practice (Section 1) (1929), PDF p. 93
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
be immediately linked with one’s peculiar tendencies to imagine
one thing rather than another. 1
Genuine recollections almost invariably explain oneself to
oneself. Suppose, for example, that you feel an instinctive aversion
to some particular kind of wine. Try as you will, you can find
no reason for your idiosyncrasy. Suppose, then, that when you
explore some previous incarnation, you remember that you died
by a poison administered in a wine of that character, your aversion
is explained by the proverb, aA burnt. child dreads the fire.” It
may be objected that in such a case your libido has created a
phantasm of itself in the manner which Freud has explained.
The criticism is just, but its value is reduced if it should happen
that you were not aware of its existence until your Magical
Memory attracted your attention to it. In fact, the essence of the
test consists in this: that your memory notifies you of something
which is the logical conclusion of the prémisses postulated by the
past.
As an example, we may cite certain memories of the Master
Therion. He followed a train of thought which led him to
remember his life as a Roman named Marius de Aquila. It would
be straining probability to présumé a connection between (a) this
hieroglyphically recorded mode of self-analysis and (J3) ordinary
introspection conducted on principles intelligible to himself. He
remembers directly various people and various events connected
with this incarnation ; and they are in themselves to ail appearance
actual. There is no particular reason why they, rather than any
others, should hâve entered his sphere. In the act of remembering
them, they are absolute. He can find no reason for correlating
them with anything in the présent. But a subséquent examina¬
tion of the record shows that the logical resuit of the Work of
Marius de Aquila did not occur to that romantic reprobate; in
point of fact, he died before anything could happen. Can we
suppose that any cause can be baulked of effect? The Universe
is unanimous in rebuttal. If then the exact effects which might be
expected to resuit from these causes are manifested in the career
i. The exception is when some whimsical circumstance ties a knot in
the corner of one’s mnemonic handkerchief.
57
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: ada196c290adc6561dda8e9d:p00093
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.