1904 · CLOSE READING
The Sword of Song
The Sword of Song (1904), PDF p. 12
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
ASCENSION DAY
5
Ho ! I adopt the number. Look
At the quaint wrapper of this book !*
I will deserve it if I can:
It is the number of a Man.33
So since in England Christ still stands
With iron nails in bloody hands
Not pierced, but grasping ! to hoist high
Children on cross of agony,
I find him real for English lives.
Up with my pretty pair of fives !34
I fight no ghosts.
“But why revile”
(You urge me) “in that vicious style
The very faith whose truths you seem
(Elsewhere)35 to hold, to hymn supreme
In your own soul ?” Perhaps you know
How mystic doctrines melt the snow
Of any faith: redeem it to
A fountain of reviving dew.
So I with Christ: but few receive
The Qabalistic Balm,36 believe
Nothing—and choose to know instead.
But, to that terror vague and dread,
External worship; all my life—
War to the knife ! War to the knife !
No ! on the other hand the Buddha
Says: “I’m surprised at you ! How could a
Person accept my law and still
Use hatred, the sole means of ill,
In Truth’s defence ? In praise of light ?”
Well ! Well ! I guess Brer Buddha’s right !
I am no brutal Cain37 to smash an Abel:
I hear that blasphemy’s unfashionable:
So in the quietest way we’ll chat about it;
No need to show teeth, claws of cat about it!
With gentle words—fiat exordium;
Exeat dolor, intret gaudium !
1 It had a design of 666 and Crowley’s name in Hebrew (which, like
most names, adds up to that figure) on the reverse.
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
Necessity of
poem.
Mysticism v.
literal interpre
tation. Former
excused.
Buddha re-
bukes poet.
Detailed
scheme of
modified poem.
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: cdd842c2ae8f5d9753c40b33:p00012
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- legacy text differs review