1954 · CLOSE READING
Magick Without Tears
Magick Without Tears (1954), PDF p. 246
Original page
Enlarge ↗
Highlights use the original PDF text layer. OCR-only matches may not be visible on the scan.
Transcription
Download text ↓raw extractionoriginal embedded textReview: unreviewed
WHAT IS CERTAINTY?
213
notes; that of the Party of the Second Part, hereinafter
referred to as-not a Heretic, an Atheist, a Bolshie, a
Die-hard, a Schismatic, an Anarchist, a Black Magician, a
Friend of Aleister Crowley, or whatever may be the current
term of abuse-Mr. A, Lord B, the Duke of C, Mrs. X, or
whatever he or she may chance to be called-into five. The
Structure called of-alI-Truth in neither of us is affected in the
least, any more than in the reading of a Thermometer with
Fahrenheit on one side and Centigrade on the other.
You naturally object that this answer is little better than
an evasion, that it automatically pushes the Gamut question
outside the Charmed of-alI-Truth Circle.
No, it doesn't really; for if you were able to put up a
Projection of those two minds, there would be, firstly, some
sort of compensation elsewhere than in the musical section;
and secondly, some Truth of a yet higher order which is
common to both.
Not una ware am I that these conceptions
are at
first exceedingly difficult to formulate clearly. I wouldn't go so
far as to say that one would have to be a Master of the
Temple to understand them; but it is really very necessary to
have grasped firmly the doctrine that "a thing is only true
insofar as it contains its contradiction in itself." (A good way
to realize this is by keeping up a merry dance of paradoxes,
such as infest Logic and Mathematics. The repeated butting
of the head against a brick wall is bound in the long run to
shake up the little grey cells [as Poirot might say] , teach you
to distrust any train of argument , however apparently
impeccable the syllogisms, and to seek ever more eagerly the
dawn of that Neschamic consciousness where all these things
are clearly understood, although impossible to express in
rational language.)
The prime function of intellect is differentiation; it deals
with marks, with limits, with the relations of what is not
identical ; in Neschamah all this work has been carried out so
perfectly that the "rough working" has passed clean out of
mind; just so, you say "I" as if it were an indivisible Unity,
Page provenance & review flags
Stable page ID: e7a83bd7c68d4e96894f9e69:p00246
Line breaks are preserved. Reading order and OCR accuracy may need review.
Printed page label has not been verified.
- No automated review flags. This does not establish transcription accuracy.